Request More Information
Our IVF Success Rates
When considering the reported success rates of IVF there are several factors to consider.
First, it is important to know who is being treated by the center since there may be a big difference in success rates depending on whether all couples seeking treatment are included or if just the most likely to become pregnant are treated. Each center has their own policy about who is offered IVF. There are many centers that will not treat the most difficult cases in order to maximize the reported IVF success rates. This means that older women or women of any age who have relatively few remaining eggs may be treated only with donor eggs and not given a chance of using their own. Our center has always been willing to take on even the most difficult situations and give each couple the best chance of getting pregnant with their own eggs. Unfortunately, when considering the reported data from the CDC about IVF success rates, this information is really not available about any IVF center. The CDC considers all women in each age group as being the same when statistics are reported. This is the main reason that it is difficult to compare statistics between IVF centers based on the CDC data alone.
Second, it is becoming clear that the fertility potential of any woman is determined by the number of genetically normal eggs that she has in her ovaries. Since there is tremendous variation in this number among even women of the same age, it is not possible to treat all women of any age in the same way. This situation is complicated by the fact that there is no available test for genetically screening eggs. The number of eggs in the ovaries is also difficult to test. The available tests of fertility potential such as FSH, Estradiol and Inhibin B levels simply reflect the current hormonal status of the ovaries and pituitary gland, which is an indirect way of determining relatively how many eggs are available at the time that the testing is performed. For this reason it is important in maximizing IVF success to treat each woman of any age as an individual. At our center, we have many IVF protocols and will always pick the one that best suits the needs of every individual. Centers that treat every woman with the same protocol are not maximizing success.
Third, there is a time element that must be considered when determining when to start an IVF cycle. We have found that the number of eggs available in the ovaries can vary significantly month to month. For those women who have less than the average number of eggs this is an important consideration. We always check the status of the ovaries on a natural menstrual cycle day 3 before any medication has been given to determine whether or not that month is a good one for starting an IVF cycle. By counting the number of follicles seen by ultrasound and measuring FSH and Estradiol levels, we can determine if that particular month should be used for treatment or if we should continue to monitor for a better one. Sometimes it is necessary to monitor for 2-3 months or more before an IVF cycle is started. However, in the long run, this approach is more likely to lead to a successful outcome than if an IVF cycle is started randomly.
Fourth, the increasing use of Pre-Implantation Genetic Screening (PGS) has greatly improved the success of IVF. Since 2011, we have been exclusively performing biopsies on day 5 embryos (blastocysts). This provides a much more accurate diagnosis than biopsies performed on day 3 embryos due to the significantly lower rate of mosaicism (multiple genetic cell lines). With the advent of Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH), PGS has become an extremely useful procedure which has led to the highest pregnancy rates that we have ever seen. We have found that when used on women under 40, the clinical pregnancy rate is 90%, and women 41-42 years old had a clinical pregnancy rate of over 70% if at least one genetically normal embryo is transferred. We feel therefore that PGS is a procedure that increases the efficiency of IVF in women of all ages.
Fifth, the development of vitrification for preservation of eggs and embryos has had a profound effect on IVF. When we began to perform biopsies on day 5 embryos, we did some embryo transfers on day 6 with fresh embryos and some following vitrification in a later cycle. We had pregnancies from both procedures but noticed that the pregnancy rate was much higher when the embryos were vitrified. We now vitrify all embryos that are biopsied for PGS and believe that this has contributed greatly to the success we have enjoyed. In fact we now perform much fewer fresh embryo transfers even when PGS is not used. We believe that the uterine environment is more receptive for embryo implantation when not exposed to the much higher Estrogen levels obtained when the ovaries are stimulated for IVF. Since we now perform more frozen cycles than fresh cycles, the CDC reporting system will no longer accurately reflect the success we are having with IVF. This reporting system hopefully will be changed to more reliably allow those who read them to understand what is possible in our program.
Read about how Pre-Implantation Genetic Screening (PGS) has improved our IVF success rates.
Current IVF Pregnancy Success Rates
Please note: A comparison of clinic success rates may not be meaningful because patient medical characteristics and treatment approaches may vary from clinic to clinic.
Read more about “A Woman’s Age and Fertility” for more information about chances for successful pregnancy.